Thursday, May 30, 2013

In Search of Civil Discourse: Let it Begin with Me


“No man can think clearly when his fists are clenched.”  George Jean Nathan

I often decide to promote a more civil discourse by being more careful about my communications, in all forms, with all persons – and even with my dog. And then, something pisses me off.

I confess that I am hopelessly partisan, but I know that there are a lot of smart people out there who, respectfully, disagree with me. Just because it doesn’t make sense to me, doesn’t mean it doesn’t make sense to somebody else; somebody else who works hard and plays fair, and doesn’t see things from my perspective.

I try to follow the ground rules I have set for myself:  no name-calling, no cheap shots, no arrogance (probably my biggest challenge), and no wasting time responding to (or egging on) those who do these things. I tell myself that, if I want more peace in the world, and a more respectful and dignified tone in our political discourse, then I have to start with that which I can control – me. I can control nothing else, and I hereby surrender any delusion to the contrary.

So, I try not to respond to the constant lambasting of President Obama by the right, and conservative leaders by the left; although, I make allowances for political satire and the cartoons of my favorite, Lalo Alcaraz. We do need to maintain a healthy sense of humor, after all. But I have to admit, I fail often in my attempts at civility. We are all passionate about certain issues in our life, but when my passion overcomes my curiosity, I lose sight of the oneness we share.

My curiosity challenges me to try to understand why something makes sense to you, even if it doesn’t make sense to me. It’s not about us trying to convince and convert one another. It’s about not having to believe that someone is an idiot just because their viewpoint and mine collide. It’s about learning how to agree to disagree, respectfully, and in a manner that is fitting for the citizens of the world’s greatest nation. No one likes to be called immoral on the basis of how they vote.

And so, this is a challenge I  continue to set for myself because I want to choose higher; choose light over darkness. And I not only invite, but encourage, you all to call me to my own new truth when I am not walking my talk. I love good conversation, and I want to hear from, and learn from my conservative friends who, I hope, don’t want to think of me as just crazy, but as someone with a different point of view born of different life experiences.

See you in the funny papers!

 

Saturday, May 18, 2013

The Boys and Girls Who Cried Wolf, and the Bleeping Sheep Who Follow Them

So, we have been scandal ridden this past week. The never-ending story of Benghazi had just about run out of meat to gnaw off of the bone, when not one, but two more "scandals" emerged, upon which the GOP immediately began to re-feast.They are even proclaiming that this is worse than Watergate because nobody died in Watergate. Wow. Is that the best they can do when it comes to critical thinking? Nobody died in Watergate? Maybe so, but lots of people died in Iraq, chasing what we now know to be a complete lie -- weapons of mass destruction.

Well, let's look at these "scandals." The Benghazi madness had nearly subsided until the mainstream news, i.e., not Fox News, decided to report the content of emails that were not only inaccurate, but now appear to have been originated, and altered, by GOP sources. While I believe it is important to find the truth, enabling us to better protect our embassies in the future; it is a waste of time to conduct a full-blown witch-hunt, especially if you have to manufacture false evidence just to make President Obama and Secretary Clinton look bad. There is no there, there.

The Democrats in congress did not conduct witch-hunts into the Bush administration when they were in the majority, in spite of the fact that several American embassies had been attacked. Moreover, by the Bush second term, we knew all about the story created around weapons of mass destruction, as well as the fact that officials in the Bush administration had received, but failed to act upon, intelligence regarding an imminent attack upon US soil in the summer of 2001. All things considered, Democrats and Speaker Pelosi were rather gracious with the Bush administration, despite the fact that many on the left were calling for heads to roll.

But let's move on to the alleged IRS scandal. Yes, it is an outrage for a government agency to single out any person or organization based upon a political bent, i.e., the Tea Party, et al. We know this because Richard Nixon ordered exactly that, targeting left-wing organizations in the 1970s when he was President of the United States. We also know that during the Bush II administration, there were a number of civil servants fired from the justice department for not aggressively pursuing left-wing adversaries. The Republicans in Congress seem to have no memory of, or apology for, any of the scandals, real scandals mind you, that occurred under Republican administrations:  Watergate, Iran-Contra, Valerie Plame, etc., etc., etc. Moreover, the person at the IRS under whose watch this mess occurred was a Bush appointee. But, the GOP is certain that it is all President Obama's fault, even though he expressed a genuine outrage, and fired several officials, including the acting commissioner. Can anyone explain this logic?

The real scandal is that any group, representing any viewpoint, gets tax-empt status at all. The confusing regulatory language inserted by the IRS in the 1950s should at least be clarified. Better yet, let's just scrap the whole 501(c)(4) idea. They are politicking, which is fine, but should not be tax-payer funded in this manner.

And finally, we come to the AP phone records scandal. Now this one actually has some issues of accountability that need to be sorted out, and I think will be. However, this story also involves the leaking of classified information, which complicates matters in regards to policy. From what I understand, the conduct of the Justice Department in this case was not unlawful. After 9/11, our willingness as Americans to surrender our privacy in the interest of safety was nearly at epidemic levels. Perhaps this story is one of the consequences of our previous capitulation to administrations that abused their power in order to stay in power.

Whatever you think of these "scandals," there is no evidence linking, or even suggesting a link between, the conduct of the individuals in question with orders given from the oval office. There is no evidence suggesting that President Obama even knew about what had transpired. If some authentic evidence is discovered to suggest otherwise, I will write about that too. Stuff happens and people make mistakes. I don't expect perfection, but I do demand accountability from my government; and that is what President Obama has delivered.

Unlike Republicans, we Democrats revel in our own common humanity, and we know that people make mistakes. Also unlike Republicans, we can own up to our mistakes and clean up the messes they create because we have a lot of practice cleaning up after Republican mistakes. President Obama has taken swift action to hold those accountable for their misconduct in these matters. President Bush let Scooter Libbey off the hook, not to mention got away with lie after lie, compounded by imcompetence and insensitivity to the American public.

And yet, the Republican sheep bleep on, as if the whole world is coming to an end because there is a dark-skinned, liberal, smart and competent man in the White House, who has actually earned his way there, every step of the way. In my humble opinion, this is the real problem for Republicans. For now America has witnessed first-hand, what most people of color already knew: Those of us who have lived and worked on the outside looking in, us affirmative-action types, have to be better, smarter and more resourceful, just to get to the same place as privileged whites. And we usually outperform them in spite of all of the additional obstacles thrown in our path by those who view our success as their own failing.

Impeach President Obama? Republicans have been calling for his impeachment since March 2009. At that time he had been in office seven weeks. Does anybody even remember what that impeachment fervor was even about?

In watching these "scandals" unfold, I am reminded of some words from the Sermon on the Mount, in which Jesus calls upon us to take out the plank in our own eyes, rather than be consumed with the speck in the eye of one our fellows. For when we have successfully removed the planks from our own eyes, then we can better see to help our brother with the speck in his eye. It's supposed to be a lesson on self-reflection before we attempt to assist others, in order to be of maximum service to those in need. Does that sound like the Republican party?

Perhaps Republicans should put down the magnifying glass with which they examine President Obama, and pick up a mirror.





Thursday, May 9, 2013

Porfiles in Cowardice: The U.S. Congress

This past week, former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was awarded the Profiles in Courage Award; an honor bestowed each May by the John F. Kennedy Library, to a person who has shown extraordinary political courage. Gabby Giffords, as we all know, was nearly assassinated outside a neighborhood grocery store as she was hosting an event in which she could listen and talk to her constituents in January of 2011. Since being shot, Congresswoman Giffords has worked very hard at her physical and emotional rehabilitation, including a major effort just to regain her ability to speak, albeit somewhat haltingly.

More recently, Congresswoman Giffords has been very outspoken in encouraging her compatriots in congress to pass legislation restricting the sale and use of military style weapons and ammo clips, as well as requiring background checks for all public sales. However, her efforts, as well as those of all of us who continue to be shocked and saddened at the rising death count of Americans by local firearms, were insufficient to persuade lawmakers to pass any legislation; not even a common sense requirement for background checks for all guns purchased publicly, including the internet and gun shows. This in spite of the fact that the American public overwhelmingly supports background checks by a ratio of 9 to 1.

This suggests to me that perhaps we should designate a new category for spotlighting political cowardice; the kind we see every day in our congress, and seem to have come to accept. We cannot accept the unacceptable. Cowardice in leadership is unacceptable and we must start paying closer attention to the acts and omissions of our legislators, at all levels.  And  when we find it, we must shine a light upon the darkness of this cowardice and expose it to our fellow citizens.

Those who took the coward's way were Republicans and Democrats, although the no votes were overwhelmingly (90%) Republican. Oddly enough, the same percentage of Americans who supported background checks. Howerever, the cowardice of doing what gets you re-elected, instead of doing what's right, is everpresent in both parties.

I've been a political junkie all my life, and I understand that making laws is a lot like making sausage, and is something most Americans may be unable to stomach. There is horse-trading and compromise, as well as honoring the voices of one's constituency, that goes on in legislating. And most lawmakers want to keep getting re-elected, and so the delicate dance of legislation is often wrought with peril. However, more and more lately, the only really important thing for too many of lawmakers is just getting re-elected. It is no longer a part of the equation, it is the whole problem and answer, in and of itself. And at the very root of it all, is money. Campaign contributions get legislators re-elected, and that seems to be the end of the line.

So, it appears that our congressional representatives believe that their only job is to get re-elected. And as long as they do what those with the purse-strings want them to do, they will be given money to pay for their re-election campaigns. And so it goes. And all this time, I thought the job of a congressional representative was to do the bidding of their constituents, i.e., voters. Silly me.

Campaigns cost money and somebody has to pay for them. But if those who can afford to fund campaigns are the only ones with any real power to influence our policies, then our democracy is surely dead. Or at least on life-support.

A courageous legislator forges an allegiance with her constituents, and acts on their behalf, regardless of the political consequences. A coward is true to nothing except saving his own skin from being turned out of office.

How about you? Do you have a nomination for the Profiles in Cowardice Award? I realize that, in such a crowded field, it may be difficult to choose just one. So how about the whole damned lot of them?






Thursday, May 2, 2013

I Thought of You and Me Today


I thought of you and me today
A mother and a son

We once walked side by side

On the beach and in the woods
Your little hands now those

Of a working man
Little league’s first baseman’s mitt

Surrendered to the gods of growth
Of manhood and love yet to be

 

I thought of you and me today
A sister and a brother
On summer days we rode our bikes

And swam and watched TV

And then we grew
And grew apart

Our love a childhood memory

 

I thought of you and me today
A father and a daughter

I used to ride upon your back
And in your face

Saw only love

A love that still enfolds me

 

I thought of you and me today
A mother and a daughter

You were there at my first breathe
And I was there beside you at your last

Alpha and Omega
We begin and end

Each other


by M. Irene Daniel
May 2, 2013